Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hadarian Writer's avatar

If you change "consciousness" to "psychology" everywhere in this article, I would probably agree with just about all of it. As it is, I don't think I agree with any of it.

Without going through the whole article, just off the top of my head, what I remember from reading it is that the idea of consciousness seems to be being treated more or less as a function of the human brain, rather than what it actually is.

For example, I thought the fact that all things that constitute life have consciousness was known. Even the cells in our bodies have their own conscious perspective on and knowledge of what their job is in our bodies. House plants turn themselves towards the sun, because they want more sun. It has also been established that trees communicate with one another through a very complex root system. They know, for example, when a fire is coming their way, or when some machines are coming through and chopping them down. The research is out there.

In the same way, love is presented here in a very small form. I call it "love in a box." It's human love. It's not really love. Real love exists like a current that a person can open up to and experience without an object to love. It's a state of being. Gratitude is the easiest form of love to experience as a human, in my experience anyway.

As for consciousness... I've been trying to gain an understanding of it myself. In my meditations, and through my spiritual path, I have seen that increased consciousness means expanding awareness of perspectives on anything and everything that you can experience. Embracing all perspectives in love. And I have many times thought that there is a definite connection between love and consciousness. In fact, I think I may have even thought they were the same thing at times. But I haven't really come far enough to write anything about it.

Expand full comment
The Pneumanaut's avatar

Very much enjoyed the drawing of parallels between consciousness and love as both gestalt phenomena. Hadn’t considered this connection before - must give it further thought. Thank you!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts